3/12/2023 0 Comments Pdfsam reputationI am also not excited about the fact that there are so few people willing to support a good piece of open source software. We *are* complaining that malware comes with what we think is trustworthy, in a way that cannot really be called obvious.Īs stated above, I give away open source software for free, too. We are *not* complaining about seeing ads, we are *not* complaining about nag features, we are *not* complaining about being asked for donations. This is definitely malware behavior, and should not be suppported, not even in order to support a good thing (as qualitative open source software, which we are definitely talking about). However, the windows were not titled "Babylon Toolbar License Agreement" or similar, and - admittedly, as most users - if have not read the license agreement and thus do not know that I have obviously accepted an agreement with Babylon stuff.įurthermore, at least Babylon is designed to stick in your system wherever it can, without offering an easy option to uninstall it again completely. The only thing that should have probably made me hesitate in the first place was that there were two end user lincenses to agree with. (Some instant messenger, don't remember its name.)īut, in both cases, it was not obvious that it would do so. Thanks again for the great I think the bundled install is not always the same - I have tried a second time and the installer tried to install something else than Babylon Toolbar. In fact, it would be cool if you could team up with PDFSam because the new Architect program has some similar functions. PDFSam offers an enhanced version with a choose-what-you-want donation. And, they only do so by giving you the option to opt out.ĭear Pdfforge, since some vocal citizens of the net are incapable of following simple instructions, I suggest you offer a paid version, guaranteed to be ad/toolbar free. It really amazes me that people bitch and moan because these guys try to recoup (not make) money for providing this great software and its associated overhead (their time, web hosting, etc). How did you people miss the option to not install the toolbar? The "are you sure?" check is even more obvious in this version than the the 1.2x series. It is the only program that I have ever seen (and I have looked) that allows one to que prints across multiple applications and then save them all as a single pdf. I really don't understand the complaints. It just really is not nice to install unwanted things and this damages not only your, but the reputation of open source in general. ![]() We decided not to do it, as we do not want to have our reputation damaged (just search for bablyon toolbar and you'll see about it's reputation). I know the idea is tempting, I am developing a quite popular piece of OS software myself and have seen offers for installer bundles, too. It does unwanted things with your users' equipment. Please, please, please, drop these bundles. (Of course, I did not read the user license agreement, it was probably somewhere in there, but that's not what I would call obvious.) But the stuff is already sitting in my Program Files and IE :( I just noticed because Firefox asked me whether I wanted to install the BabylonToolbar Addon. There was *no* obvious dialog which asked me whether I want it, or even told me about it. ![]() ![]() I just have installer PDFCreator on my new PC and saw that it comes with an unwanted installation.īy installing your product, another one called "BabylonToolbar" was installed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |